ITIAN Knowledge Hub
Technology Simplified — Solutions That Work

chatgpt-prompt-repair-clinic

Prompt Repair Clinic | ITIAN Knowledge Hub

Module 5 · Lesson 4 of 4 · Course Lesson 19 of 26

Prompt Repair Clinic

Troubleshoot weak prompts before blaming the answer. Diagnose the underlying problem, repair only what is needed and test whether the revised prompt produces a more useful result.

  • Beginner
  • About 22 minutes
  • Four-case repair worksheet
  • 4-question check

Learning Objectives

What you will learn

By the end of this clinic, you will be able to:

  • Diagnose vague, overloaded, contradictory and context-poor prompts.
  • Separate a large request into manageable stages.
  • Remove or prioritise instructions that cannot all be satisfied.
  • Supply an example or source material when style or factual accuracy matters.
  • Repair four flawed prompts using the ITIAN CLEAR method.
  • Test a repaired prompt and compare its response with the original.

Four Common Diagnoses

Name the problem before repairing it

?

Vague

The task or definition of success is unclear, so ChatGPT must make important choices.

Symptoms: “make it better”, “write something”, no audience or output goal.
++

Overloaded

Several substantial jobs are packed into one request without priorities or stages.

Symptoms: omissions, shallow coverage, mixed deliverables and inconsistent detail.

Contradictory

Two requirements cannot both be met, or the prompt gives competing directions.

Symptoms: “comprehensive in 50 words”, “formal and very casual”, unclear priority.

Context-poor

The prompt refers to information, examples or circumstances that were never provided.

Symptoms: “match our style”, “use the report”, missing facts, location or audience.

One prompt can have several problems

Choose the primary diagnosis—the issue most likely to prevent a useful answer—then repair secondary issues. Do not add complexity merely to make the prompt look more sophisticated.

Repair Process

Diagnose → Prioritise → Repair → Test → Compare

1

Diagnose

Name the prompt’s primary problem.

2

Prioritise

Decide the essential goal and constraints.

3

Repair

Add, remove, split or clarify instructions.

4

Test

Run the original and repaired prompts fairly.

5

Compare

Check relevance, accuracy and usability.

Three Repair Techniques

Make the smallest change that solves the problem

Split large tasks into stages

Ask for a plan or first deliverable, review it, then continue. This reduces omissions and lets you correct direction early.

BeforeResearch, plan, write and promote my complete workshop.
AfterStage 1: ask five questions, then create the workshop outline only.

Remove conflicting instructions

Choose a priority, realistic length and compatible tone. State which requirement wins if a trade-off remains.

BeforeWrite a comprehensive 40-word guide.
AfterGive a 40-word overview, then list three topics needing fuller guidance.

Supply examples or source material

Attach or paste the material you expect ChatGPT to use. Label it clearly and explain what should be copied versus adapted.

BeforeMatch our usual newsletter style.
AfterUse the attached approved example for tone and structure; do not copy its facts.

Interactive Repair Worksheet

Diagnose and repair four prompts

Choose the primary diagnosis and write a repaired version. Your work is saved in this browser. The answer guide becomes available after checking.

1

The unclear rewrite

Make this better and more interesting.

2

The everything-at-once request

Research beginner landscape photography, design a twelve-week course, write every lesson, create all worksheets, make a marketing campaign, draft fifty social posts and give me the final website.

3

The impossible brief

Write a comprehensive legal and safety guide in exactly 60 words. Include every exception, keep it informal and highly technical, and guarantee it is correct for every country.

4

The missing source

Use the report and write the customer email in exactly our normal style. Include the correct figures and deadline.

Suggested answer guide

Case 1 · Vague

The prompt does not identify the source text, audience or desired improvement.

Rewrite the attached workshop introduction for adult beginners. Keep the facts unchanged, use a warm professional tone and reduce it to 120 words. Improve clarity and replace jargon with plain language.

Case 2 · Overloaded

The request contains several major projects. Begin with a discovery and planning stage.

We are planning a twelve-week beginner landscape-photography course. Stage 1 only: ask me up to eight questions about learners, outcomes, delivery and resources. Then propose a one-page module outline for review. Do not write lessons or marketing material yet.

Case 3 · Contradictory

The length, depth, tone, audience, jurisdiction and guarantee conflict. Reduce the scope and require qualified checking.

For a New Zealand small-business audience, draft a plain-language 300-word overview of the main safety responsibilities for [activity]. State that it is general information, cite current official New Zealand sources and list questions requiring qualified legal or safety advice.

Case 4 · Context-poor

The report, style example, audience, figures and deadline are unavailable.

Using the attached approved report and example email, draft a customer update for [audience]. Use the example for tone and structure but use only figures and dates confirmed in the report. If the deadline is not stated, insert [DEADLINE TO CONFIRM] rather than guessing.

Optional Extension Challenge

Repair a prompt with more than one diagnosis

Make a brilliant complete business plan and website for my idea. Keep it very detailed but under 200 words, match my brand, use the research and guarantee it will make a profit.

Look for all four problem types

Ask what information is missing, which requirements conflict, how the project should be staged and which outcome can never be guaranteed.

Before Testing

A repaired prompt should pass these checks

One clear current goalThe next deliverable is specific and reviewable.
Enough relevant contextRequired facts, sources and examples are actually supplied.
Compatible requirementsLength, depth, format and tone can all be satisfied together.
Named audience and useThe response can match the reader’s knowledge and next action.
Boundaries and uncertaintyChatGPT knows what not to invent and what must be flagged.
Fair comparison planYou will test the same underlying task and judge relevant criteria.

A better prompt cannot create missing truth

If the source material is wrong, incomplete or unavailable, clearer wording will not fix the evidence. Obtain reliable information and verify important outputs independently.

Practical Activity

Repair four prompts and test one

Complete the clinic worksheet above, then choose one repaired prompt for a fair before-and-after test. Progress is stored in this browser.

Knowledge Check

Check your understanding

1. What is the primary problem with “Make this better”?
2. What is the best first repair for a request containing several major projects?
3. What should you do with conflicting requirements?
4. When should you supply an example or source?

Finish the Module

Record your progress

Official References

Prompting guidance from OpenAI